What is typically the outcome of taking action without thorough review in an EDM?

In the context of ethical decision-making models (EDM), taking action without a thorough review often leads to undefined consequences. This is primarily because acting hastily or without sufficient analysis can result in decisions that have unforeseen or ambiguous effects on clients, the therapeutic relationship, and ethical standards.

When an individual makes decisions without carefully considering the implications, they may overlook important factors such as client well-being, potential conflicts of interest, or the broader ethical context of their actions. This can lead to negative outcomes that were not anticipated, as the complexities of ethical dilemmas often require careful exploration and consideration to identify all potential consequences. Undefined consequences can manifest as confusion, harm to clients, or ethical violations, all of which underscore the necessity of thorough review before taking action.

The other choices do not adequately capture the risks involved in skipping the review process. Successful resolution implies a favorable outcome, which is unlikely without proper analysis. Lost opportunities suggests that there may have been alternatives that were not considered, but does not convey the ambiguity of the results. Informed decision-making indicates a deliberate and comprehensive approach, which contradicts the premise of acting prematurely. Thus, the most fitting outcome of action taken without thorough review in an EDM is indeed undefined consequences.